Vanzemaljci i Buducnost Zemlje

Galactic Federation: Aha,

i jos nesto, ako ne postoji antigravitacija, beskonacno detalja i vektora energije, i visa svest, kako to da planete ostanu u savrseno stabilnoj orbiti tokom milijardi godina i mnogo svetlosnih godina predjenog puta, a da ne padnu na zvezdu recimo?

1927. godine britanski arheolog i avanturist Fredric Mitchell Hedges i njegova kćer su zajedno bili u potrazi za nestalim civilizacijama koje su povezane
sa Atlantidom. Njegova kćer je nekim čudom pronašla lubanju izrađenu od čistog kristala. Pri vijest o pronalasku lubanje odmah su došli domoroci iz
obližnjih mjesta, pali na koljena i molili se. Jedan stari Maya je objasnio da je lubanja stara, preko 100 000 godina i da je samo jedna od ukupno 13 lubanja
koje su neprocjenjivo blago njegovih predaka. Ona sadrže informacije o nastanku čovjeka, odgovore na pitanja o najvećim tajnama i ako se svih 13 lubanja
spoje, počinju razgovarati.

Detaljnija pretraga lubanje, koja je učinjena 1970. godine u laboratorijima Hewlett-Packarda, potvrdila je sljedeće navode:
- lubanja je izrađena od čistog kristala i suprotno njenoj prirodnoj osovini. Pri takvoj obradi bi trebala zapravo se raspasti u tisuću dijelova
- vjerojatno je prvo grubo obrađena dijamantnim oruđem, te kasnije sa smjesom vode i pijeska glatko polirana. Procijenjeno radno vrijeme: preko 300 godina. "ova prokleta stvar zapravo ne bi smjela postojati" izjavio je jedan od znanstvenika.
Postavlja se pitanje da li su Maya bili u stanju izraditi predmete koje ni danas, sa najmodernijom tehnologijom nismo u stanju napraviti? Da li su prijašnje civilizacije bile naprednije i razvijene više od nas?
Odgovori na ovakva pitanja nisu jednostavna, jer znanstvenici i arheolozi uvijek pronađu predmete koje nije moguće smjestiti u poznati tok povijesti. Oni se ističu iz toga i nazivaju se Out of place artefacts.

FARAONSKI NOŽ

Šta je sa nožem faraona? 6.Novembra 1922. godine je pronađeno u grobnici faraona Tut-ench-Amun, njegovo blago: sarkofazi, maske, figure egipatskih bogova, sanduci, zlatni nakiti itd. Ukupno više od 5.000 raznih predmeta. Najmisteriozniji nalaz je nož faraona koji je bez rđe. Gvožđe je u to vreme bilo vrednije nego zlato, pa i za faraona je to bila velika vrednost. Značaj tog noža je itekako velik, to je vidljivo i po tome što je faraonu bio zavezan s desne strane uz nogu, pa čak i u grobu.

Ali, kako je faraon došao u posed tog noža? Da li je zaista taj nož jedan 'Out of Place Artefact' kako inace razni izvori to tvrde? O njemu možemo skoro neverovatne navode pročitati: Da je saliven od nerđajućeg ćelika, da nije bio naveden sa ostalim pronalascima, da njegovu leguru je moguće ostvariti samo u vakuumskim uslovima. A, tadašnji Egipćani nisu poznavali ni salivanje gvožđa, a kamoli vakuumske uslove pri dobivanju takve legure.
Manfred Sachse, predsednik istraživačkog instituta za rudna dobra, intezivno se bavio proučavanjem pronalaska noža. No, od kojeg materijala je taj nož napravljen ni on ne zna. 'To niko ne zna', kaže Manfred. I dodaje: 'Dr. Lukas, koji je te nalaze tada zapisivao, nije analizirao sastojke gvožđa kod tog noža. Niti je to do dan danas učinjeno. Egipatski Muzej u Kairu odbija dati nož za analiziranje van svoje zemlje, a potrebnih aparata za njegovu analizu nema u Egiptu. Premeštaj svega potrebnog je jako skup, te nismo našli institucije koje bi finansirale takvu analizu. Znači, svi navodi o sastojcima i načinu salivanja tog noža su jednostavno izmišljeni. Mada, u grobnici faraona vladali su odlični uslovi koji su očuvali nož od vlage. Svi pronađeni predmeti su u odličnom stanju."
Ali, otkud onda faraonu gvozdeni nož? Kako je on došao u njegov posed? Kupljen je u inostranstvu: Hetiti, susedi Egipćana, poznavali su već tada mogućnost salivanja gvožđa. Druga mogućnost: Gvožđe je moglo biti dobiveno i od jednog meteorita. I zaista, gvožđe je tada nosilo naziv 'crni bakar s neba'. I kada se nađe takav meteorit, potrebno ga je samo obraditi u željeni oblik. S izvesnim pravom bi znači mogli tvrditi da je nož vanzemaljskog porekla! I kao takav, bi tada mogao imati kristalnu strukturu koju je moguće dobiti samo u vakuumskim uslovima. No, koliko je običan ili neobičan taj nož, to možemo tek znati kada se dotični naučno proveri. Svi navodi do tada ostaju: špekulacija.

- lubanja je izrađena od čistog kristala i suprotno njenoj prirodnoj osovini. Pri takvoj obradi bi trebala zapravo se raspasti u tisuću dijelova

starkg: Da a sta sa ovim istrazivanjima?

1927. godine britanski arheolog i avanturist Fredric Mitchell Hedges i njegova kćer su zajedno bili u potrazi za nestalim civilizacijama koje su povezane
sa Atlantidom. Njegova kćer je nekim čudom pronašla lubanju izrađenu od čistog kristala.

the skull of doom

The most famous crystal skull is the Mitchell-Hedges "skull of doom," allegedly discovered by a 17-year old Anna Mitchell-Hedges in 1924 or 1927 while accompanying her adoptive father on an excavation of the ancient Mayan city of Lubaantun in Belize, where the elder Mitchell-Hedges believed he would find the ruins of Atlantis. The evidence collected by Joe Nickell proves beyond a reasonable doubt that Mitchell-Hedges bought the skull at a Sotheby's sale in 1943 for £400.

This clear quartz skull is about 5.25 inches high and weighs about 11 pounds. It superficially resembles stone skulls made by the Aztecs. The Aztec skulls are stylized, however. The Mitchell-Hedges skull is realistic with a detachable jaw.

Much of the occult and sinister legend surrounding the so-called skull of doom originated with Mitchell-Hedges, who claimed that the Skull of Doom is made of pure rock crystal and according to scientists it must have taken over 150 years, generation after generation working all the days of their lives, patiently rubbing down with sand an immense block of rock crystal until finally the perfect Skull emerged.

It is at least 3,600 years old and according to legend was used by the High Priest of the Maya when performing esoteric rites. It is said that when he willed death with the help of the skull, death invariably followed. It has been described as the embodiment of all evil (F.A. Mitchell-Hedges).
The age of the object, as well as the other claims made about its making and history, were fabricated by Mitchell-Hughes. The man who owned the piece, Sidney Burney, and those who were on the Lubannatun expedition, denied that Mitchell-Hedges found the skull. Mitchell-Hedges himself never mentioned the skull until just after he bought it in 1943.

Anna has continued the hoax. Even though there is no evidence that she was even at Lubaantun when the discovery was supposedly made, she has maintained that Burney only had the piece on loan from her father until he could pay off a debt he owed Burney. If so, why didn't her father just pay Burney back instead of bidding for the item in an auction? Here is the story told on the "Official Website" of F. A. and Anna Mitchell-Hedges:

In 1943, Mitchell-Hedges got embroiled in another controversy that still rages in some quarters to this day. In times before burglar alarms, it was not unusual to leave valuable items with friends if one was going away for long periods of time.

Mitchell-Hedges did this with a school friend, Sidney Burney, who had always shown an interest in the Crystal Skull. However, in 1943, Burney inexplicably put the Crystal Skull up for auction at Sotheby’s in London.

Mitchell-Hedges learnt of this the day before and was so furious that for a while he was unable to speak. Unable to contact Burney, he arose the next day at 5am and traveled to London to retrieve his property.

Sotheby’s informed him that the vendor was Sidney Burney’s son. When they refused to withdraw it from the sale, Mitchell-Hedges realized the easiest way of regaining his property was to purchase it back. This he did for £400.*
In any case, Anna has received some attention and made a few dollars over the years by putting her skull on display, claiming it came from outer space and was kept in Atlantis before it was brought to Belize.* She is still in possession of the skull, but seems to have tired of the publicity and has retired it from public viewing.

In 1970, Anna let Frank Dorland, a crystal carver, examine her skull. Dorland declared that it is excellent for scrying and it emits sounds and light, depending on the position of the planets. He claimed that the skull originated in Atlantis and was carried around by the Knights Templar during the crusades. He claims they had the skull examined at a Hewlett-Packard lab. D. Trull uncritically reports that the lab found that the skull had been carved against the natural axis of the crystal. Modern crystal sculptors always take into account the axis, or orientation of the crystal's molecular symmetry, because if they carve "against the grain," the piece is bound to shatter -- even with the use of lasers and other high-tech cutting methods.

To compound the strangeness, HP could find no microscopic scratches on the crystal which would indicate it had been carved with metal instruments. Dorland's best hypothesis for the skull's construction is that it was roughly hewn out with diamonds, and then the detail work was meticulously done with a gentle solution of silicon sand and water. The exhausting job -- assuming it could possibly be done in this way -- would have required man-hours adding up to 300 years to complete.*
Dorland's claims formed the basis of Garvin's book on crystal skulls.

The questionable origin of the Mitchell-Hedges skull has not deterred belief in the skull's mysterious properties. Rather, at least 13 other skulls have mysteriously appeared over the years. Some of these skulls are claimed to have magical origins and healing powers. However, a study of several crystal skulls by the British Museum in 1996 indicates that the only magic involved in the creation of these skulls was in keeping their fraudulent origin a secret. The study concluded that the skulls were made in Germany within the past 150 years. The recent origin explains how they were made with tools unavailable to the ancient Mayans or Aztecs.

Using electron microscopes, the researchers found that two of the skulls possessed straight, perfectly-spaced surface markings, indicating the use of a modern polishing wheel. Genuine ancient objects would show haphazard tiny scratches from the hand-polishing process.*
A similar result occurred in 1992 when the Smithsonian received a crystal skull from an anonymous source who claimed it was an Aztec skull that had been bought in Mexico City in 1960. Research by the Smithsonian concluded that several crystal skulls popular with the New Agers originated with Eugene Boban, a Frenchman of dubious character. Boban dealt in antiques in Mexico City between 1860 and 1880, and seems to have acquired his skulls from a source in Germany. Jane MacLaren Walsh of the Smithsonian concluded that several crystal skulls held in museums were manufactured between 1867 and 1886 ("Crystal Skulls and Other Problems," Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington DC, 1996).
In the May 27, 2010, online edition of Archaeology Walsh states that she "had two opportunities to examine the Mitchell-Hedges skull closely and to take silicone molds of carved and polished elements of it, which I have analyzed under high-power light and scanning-electron microscopes....The microscopic evidence presented here indicates that the skull is not a Maya artifact but was carved with high-speed, modern, diamond-coated lapidary tools....It is not unreasonable to conclude that the Mitchell-Hedges skull, which first appeared in 1933, was also created within a short time of its debut. "

more skullduggery?

Other so-called ancient crystal skulls have had histories as dubious as the Mitchell-Hedges skull. For example, a skull called "Max" was supposedly given to the people of Guatemala by a Tibetan healer. Another pair of skulls, known as the British Skull and the Paris Skull, was allegedly found in Mexico in the late 19th century by mercenaries. They are very similar and one may have been the model for the other. The Paris skull is said to represent Mictlantecuhtli, the Aztec god of the dead. It is not alleged to have any occult powers, however.

The Mayan Skull and the Amethyst Skull were allegedly found in Guatemala early in this century. "Nick" Nocerino claims he met a shaman in 1949 while traveling in Mexico who led him to a Mayan priest who said he was authorized to sell the skulls because the village needed money for food. Nick didn't buy them, but he studied them scientifically and found some startling things such as "its true origin is cloaked in mystery" and it had the power to give him hours of meaningful visions.

There isn't a shard of evidence that these crystal skulls are mysterious in any way. What is mysterious is their continued popularity and the continued mythology as to their origins and powers.

3way: Dok se ne utvrdi kako su stvarno nasli tu lobanju - nista. Postoje vise nego dobri dokazi da je lobanja kupljena i da je prilicno mladasna.

U svakom slucaju proglasavati razne nozeve, statue, misteriozna pisma i ostale artefakte kao "Out of Place" na osnovu nagadjanja, bez ikakve provere o cemu se tu radi ( ovo je za one koji hoce da gledaju :) ) je skroz neozbiljno.

Odin D.
- lubanja je izrađena od čistog kristala i suprotno njenoj prirodnoj osobini. Pri takvoj obradi bi trebala zapravo se raspasti u tisuću dijelova

Mozes li nam objasniti sta ovo znaci?

3way
Dok se ne utvrdi kako su stvarno nasli tu lobanju - nista. Postoje vise nego dobri dokazi da je lobanja kupljena i da je prilicno mladasna.

Da mogu, priroda kristala tj. materijala od koga je lobanja sacinjena nema pogodne karakteristike za obradu, i to tako komplikovanu kao ova lobanja. Dakle kada bi ste pokusali sa danasnjim (tada je to bilo 1970 godina) alatima da napravite nesto slicno, taj komad kristala bi se verovatno raspao do finalne obrade.
Mislim da je ovo jasno ko dan.

Dejan71V: Rongorongo jeste misteriozno pismo ali ne i nepostojece a ako je to tebi neozbiljno - tvoja stvar.

Dejan71V:
Statue na uskrsnjem ostrvu su i te kako stvarne i s obzirom da se omaleno ostrvo nalazi hiljadama kilometara usamljeno na sred okeana za nauku je jos neobjasnjeno otkuda tamo...

3way: Sta gde se nalazi? Ostrvo ili statue?

i to je moguce da je izmisljeno jer ja licno nisam tada bio ni rodjen a kamo li da budem tu.