Da li neko ima nesto iskustva sa Samsung L100?

Vidim jeftin je dosta aparat, specifikacije na papiru deluju privlacno (u odnosu na cenu), ali - jel valja ovo cemu?

Samsung L100:

-Metalno kućište
-8.2 Mega pixela
-3x optički zum
-2.5" inteligentni LCD
-Audio Video zapis (30 slika/s)
-Detekcija lica
-Stabilizacija slike
-Litijumska baterija i brzi punjač


Molim nekog ako je probao ovaj model da mi javi prednosti / nedostatke.

Hvala, pozdrav!

Potpis

oligofrenolog

Jedino što vidim je da ta stabilizacija nije prava stabilizacija.

+ puna manuelna podešavanja. Možda ta stabilizacija nije "prava", ali trebalo bi proveriti koliko aparata u toj cenovnoj klasi (do 100$) nudi čak i ovoliko.
BTW, nekoliko review-ova je sasvim solidno ocenilo kamericu.

Izašla su i dva entry-level modela sa optičkom (i digitalnom) stabilizacijom- M110 i L310W. Potonji sa 28-102mm objektivom i 1/1.7 senzorom. Ako imaš vremena, mislim da bi trebalo sačekati ova dva.

Potpis

Save the Panda!

To me ustvari najvise brine kod ovog aparata - ima on digitalnu stabilizaciju, ali po opisima
radi jako lose... incace po svemu ostalom, sasvim dobar aparat. Ne znam kako je ranije bilo
sa Samsung-om na ovom polju, ali izgleda je sad resio da se progura tim nekim agresivnim
(nizim) cenama. O kvalitetu Samsunga na ovom polju bas malo znam a i nesto nisam primetio
da se toliko o njemu i prica, a mozda su sasvim OK aparati. Ne znam....
Imam neke samsungove proizvode - monitor, tv, ... i onako generalno sam zadovoljan njihovim
proizvodima, ali o njihovim foto-aparatima ne znam nista.

Potpis

oligofrenolog

Evo par ocena sa primerima...

http://www.infosyncworld.com/r...cameras/samsung-l100/9525.html

http://freshgear.wordpress.com...view-samsung-l100-82mp-camera/

Sa prvog linka:

Now we get to Samsung's new-fangled version of digital image-stabilization. Simply put, you shouldn't buy the L100 with this feature in mind. If you need image-stabilization then check out the Canon Powershot A590 IS, and if you don't need image-stabilization then the L100 is cheap enough to justify not caring about the feature at all. DIS seems to derive most of its shake-reduction simply from forcing the ISO to 200, and at first glance the image seems OK, but peer closer and it falls apart. The whole photo is plagued with digital errors – not ISO noise, but flat-out incorrect pixels. There's a yellow line to the left of the faucet and an errant red dot over the right valve, and the top of the entire photo is lined with garbage pixels. Again, this isn't a deal killer; it's just a last-resort at best.

The Samsung L100 might not take outstanding pictures, but especially for its street price, its image quality is nothing to shake a stick at. The camera is a little on the over-sharp side, which leads to rings around hard edges, but otherwise colors are deep and accurate with above-average detail. The camera does particularly well with landscapes and other broad subjects but slightly less so with close-ups, which tend to exacerbate its tendency to oversharpen. The digital image-stabilization is largely a botch, but the L100 sells for less than many cameras with no stabilization at all, so this hardly detracts from the camera's value.

Noise management is surprisingly excellent, with tightly grouped blocking all the way to ISO-800. ISO-1600 finally sees some distracting blotches and white-balance errors, but it remains quite usable, especially compared to some of the more horrid 1600 speeds we've seen. There doesn't seem to be anything particularly special about the L100's innards; it's just a well made sensor with a good pixel-to-size ratio.

Potpis

Save the Panda!