Bas to slicno pise i jedan citalac ovog teksta sa linka Pc gamer , kao komentar i autor ga demantuje . Citalac je verovatno Bugarin
Jarred Walton Mod Alexander Yordanov • 4 days ago
I'm not sure why you think this is a problem -- Core i5-7600K is easily the best value from a pure gaming perspective. There are a few games where it's slower than the 6-core Ryzen chips, others where it's substantially faster. This will likely remain the case for the foreseeable future.
If you're hoping to do other stuff while gaming, to the point where Ryzen 5 6-core is a better choice, the only real-world scenario where I've found that true is if you're doing CPU-based video encoding.
For people that want to do other stuff besides games, like video editing, sure, Ryzen 5 1600 is a great chip. Dropping a bit of gaming performance for better non-gaming performance is obviously a choice some will make. But it's probably not as big of a deal as many try to make it out to be. Core i5 is plenty powerful and will easily handle what most people do on a daily basis. Those who do more have in general already moved beyond 4-core CPUs.
Alexander Yordanov Jarred Walton • 4 days ago
Short sighted. The i5 already has issues in some games in minimums even with the unrealistic clean install bench runs.
No upgrade path.
And as I said - unrealistic. Even in the very rare cases where I aint running QV at home and suffering without gaming, I still have tabs open, Skype open, FB open, music... it does sometimes stutter in some modern games.
The scientific method with completely clean slates is not objective here. And I pity gamers who go for 7600K with the deliding process, expensive mobos and water cooling only to get blown away in 1-2 years without an upgrade path by a cheaper chip. I got to mock people back in the day that bought dual core chips over quad cores, I will get to do it again
but I dont want to. Your readers dont deserve that.
Jarred Walton Mod Alexander Yordanov • 4 days ago
This is such a weak argument and I'm tired of hearing it. I ran some tests with a Core i5-7600K, using my standard "clean" test environment, then a "medium load" environment with three browsers running, each with multiple tabs. Skype is on in the background, Steam, Origin, UPlay, and GoG Galaxy are running. Discord is open in a browser tab as well.
I did a second "heavy" load where I had the same things as before but also added a second monitor viewing a Twitch livestream, while at the same time doing a GPU-based Twitch stream on the test system.
Here are numbers for the testing (which I haven't ran on other CPUs, because it takes a lot of time):
http://imgur.com/A3bu1Lm (Average FPS)
http://imgur.com/HLXENi0 (Minimum FPS)
A 10 percent loss in gaming performance, using a pretty heavy workload (more than likely 90 percent of gamers use) and performance is *still* better than a Ryzen 5 1600X (stock) running a clean load. You would really need to stretch things to make i5-7600K consistently a worse gaming choice than a Ryzen 5 chip.
Re: Mišljenje o kombinaciji matične ploče, procesora i video kartice