Novo

Forum kao aplikacija na telefonu

Dodajte forum na početni ekran i koristite ga kao aplikaciju, sa menijem na dnu ekrana.

  • 45 odgovora
  • 12.229 pregleda

Najnovija ↓

Re: Jos jedan harpun u celo FOSSa 08.03.2011. u 13:54 · pre 190 meseci #41
Ja ne znam ni za jedan distro koji je 100% GPL, već se koriste i druge licence za pojedine pakete.

Da je RHEL 100% bilo slobodan u smislu definicije fondacije ya slobodan softver, bilo otvoren u smislu definicije inicijative za otvoreni kod, on bi bio redistributivan, tj. svako ko ga nabavi legalnim putem bi mogao legalno da ga obesi na internet i distribuira dalje. Međutim, to očigledno nije slučaj.
Potpis
Nije bitno koji su zaključci izvučeni, već kako se do njih došlo.
Re: Jos jedan harpun u celo FOSSa 08.03.2011. u 19:51 · pre 190 meseci #42
^

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CentOS

> CentOS developers use Red Hat's source code to create a final product very similar to Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Red Hat's branding and logos are changed because Red Hat does not allow them to be redistributed.[4]
Potpis
Bolje ispasti glup nego iz aviona
http://www.mulaz.org/
Re: Jos jedan harpun u celo FOSSa 08.03.2011. u 22:02 · pre 190 meseci #44
Citat:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux:

Verbatim copying and redistribution of the entire Red Hat Enterprise Linux distribution is not permitted due to trademark restrictions.


Dakle, RHEL nije redistributivan (zbog žigova, a ne softvera, svejedno), pa ga ne treba ni uzimati kao primer FOSS-a.
Potpis
Nije bitno koji su zaključci izvučeni, već kako se do njih došlo.
Re: Jos jedan harpun u celo FOSSa 09.03.2011. u 19:36 · pre 190 meseci #45
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html

>“Free software” is a matter of liberty, not price. To understand the concept, you should think of “free” as in “free speech,” not as in “free beer.”

>“Free software” does not mean “noncommercial.” A free program must be available for commercial use, commercial development, and commercial distribution. Commercial development of free software is no longer unusual; such free commercial software is very important. You may have paid money to get copies of free software, or you may have obtained copies at no charge. But regardless of how you got your copies, you always have the freedom to copy and change the software, even to sell copies.

>When talking about free software, it is best to avoid using terms like “give away” or “for free,” because those terms imply that the issue is about price, not freedom. Some common terms such as “piracy” embody opinions we hope you won't endorse. See Confusing Words and Phrases that are Worth Avoiding for a discussion of these terms. We also have a list of proper translations of “free software” into various languages.

Software jeste free (as in speech)... artwork i ime nije.
Potpis
Bolje ispasti glup nego iz aviona
http://www.mulaz.org/
Re: Jos jedan harpun u celo FOSSa 09.03.2011. u 20:00 · pre 190 meseci #46
Ja od filozofije više cenim precizne definicije.

Citat:
The Free Software Definition:

Free software is a matter of the users' freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software. More precisely, it means that the program's users have the four essential freedoms:

- The freedom to run the program, for any purpose (freedom 0).
- The freedom to study how the program works, and change it to make it do what you wish (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
- The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor (freedom 2).
- The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others (freedom 3). By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to benefit from your changes. Access to the source code is a precondition for this.


Ako paket kao celina nije redistributivan, onda kao celina nije slobodan.
Potpis
Nije bitno koji su zaključci izvučeni, već kako se do njih došlo.
Odgovori
Prijavite se da biste odgovorili u ovoj temi.PrijavaRegistracija

Premeštanje teme