Re: Windows 2003: IIS u kernelu!!!Citat:
degojs
As for Web delivery, Server 2003, with the new edition of Internet Information Server (IIS), IIS 6 is much better than Microsoft's previous operating system and Web server combinations. But, IIS 6 has some of its functionality built right into the Server 2003 kernel, so you can forget about running IIS 6 on W2K or NT. IIS 5 is the end of the line for those platforms. All that said, the bottom line is that IIS 6 on Server 2003, delivers files 90% faster than IIS 5 on W2K Server, and a whopping 110% faster than NT.
A kakvi su rezultati u odnosu na neke druge OS-eve i Web servere pogledajte sami, ja ne smem da prenesem ovde posto bi dobili gomilu poruka besnih korisnika drugih OS-eva. Verovatno cu da postavim temu na advocacy ;-)
As for Web delivery, Server 2003, with the new edition of Internet Information Server (IIS), IIS 6 is much better than Microsoft's previous operating system and Web server combinations. But, IIS 6 has some of its functionality built right into the Server 2003 kernel, so you can forget about running IIS 6 on W2K or NT. IIS 5 is the end of the line for those platforms. All that said, the bottom line is that IIS 6 on Server 2003, delivers files 90% faster than IIS 5 on W2K Server, and a whopping 110% faster than NT.
A kakvi su rezultati u odnosu na neke druge OS-eve i Web servere pogledajte sami, ja ne smem da prenesem ovde posto bi dobili gomilu poruka besnih korisnika drugih OS-eva. Verovatno cu da postavim temu na advocacy ;-)
pa neces. dobices zacudjeni pogled posto je kesiranje stari i veoma dobro poznati proces ubrzavanja http servera, cak i u kernelu. postoji jedna stvar koju radi vecina kompanija kada zele da prikazu prednost njihovog proizvoda u odnosu na drugi, a to je da se benchmarking prilagodjava tom proizvodu, a isto tako se zanemaruju optimizacije kod drugih proizvoda sa kojima poredis rezultate. npr. mysql to radi (da sada ne bi ispalo da branim open source). mislim da je malo zdrave skepticnosti potrebno u ovakvim situacijama, ja barem ne verujem dok ne vidim. ono sto mene cini skepticnim je to sto je m$ svaki svoj proizvod najavljivao na manje-vise isti nacin i sve je to deo marketinga, jer proizvod treba prodati, a neces ga prodati ako kazes "evo, nije on los, nesto je losiji od konkurencije, ali moze bas lepo da radi". uostalom, videcemo.
