Žene i nauka (odnosno koliko se isplati baviti naukom)Jednu vrstu odgovora nudi Philip Greenspun, predavač na MIT, lamentirajući: pametnije žene su jednostavno postupile razumno i našle bolje plaćene poslove:
Citat:
Adjusted for IQ, quantitative skills, and working hours, jobs in science are the lowest paid in the United States.
Citat:
Why does anyone think science is a good job?
The average trajectory for a successful scientist is the following:
1. age 18-22: paying high tuition fees at an undergraduate college
2. age 22-30: graduate school, possibly with a bit of work, living on a stipend of $1800 per month
3. age 30-35: working as a post-doc for $30,000 to $35,000 per year
4. age 36-43: professor at a good, but not great, university for $65,000 per year
5. age 44: with young children at home (if lucky), fired by the university ("denied tenure" is the more polite term for the folks that universities discard), begins searching for a job in a market where employers primarily wish to hire folks in their early 30s
http://philip.greenspun.com/careers/women-in-science
Da li su na ovim prostorima poslovi u nauci više "woman-friendly", tj koliko se uopšte isplati baviti naukom?
Re: Žene i nauka (odnosno koliko se isplati baviti naukom)
Re: Žene i nauka (odnosno koliko se isplati baviti naukom)
Re: Žene i nauka (odnosno koliko se isplati baviti naukom)