Ovo je Zbigniew Bzezinski rekao o Kinezima u svom govoru u Londonu 2008:
Citat:
And China so far at least is generally constructive in it's international conduct.It is economically nationalist and that is a problem.But it is fundamentally a cautious and patient revisionist power.Cautious, patient, revisionist power.It wants the international system to change, but it is cautious in the way it's pursuing that objective.And it is patient.And one of the hole markers of the Chinese leadership is fore site and patients.I've dealt with the Chinese leaders now, for, - thirty years.I go often, whenever I go to China and meet the top leaders.And I've gotten to know them.And I have to say I have high respect for this sense of direction but also balance and proportion.I can not do better than repeat what Deng Xiaoping said at one point, about the Chinese approach to international affairs and I quote: "Observe calmly, secure our position, cope with affairs calmly, hide our capacities, and bide.., our time,be good at maintaining a low profile and never claim leadership."(Audience laughs soft smuggerly)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/1276...am-House-Speech-November-2008-
Youtube video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4Qv7lbVw9s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9YTp6jRVt4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeHpdI_LJrI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmE3NxarKOs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZaGZ6ebzyiM
Inace, o geopolitici zna vise nego svi clanovi ES foruma zajedno.
U svojoj knjizi "The Grand Chessboard" opisuje mogucnost kreiranja alijanse izmedju Japana i Kine i predstavlja ih kao najvecu pretnju US u sledecem veku, kao i nacine na koje US mora da reaguje da bi po svaku cenu sprecila formiranje ovakve alijanse. Trenutno novoizabrana vlada Japana (prvi put u zadnjih 50 godina su promenili vlast(demokratija?)) pokusava da se priblizi Kini i izbaci US sa svoje teritorije.
Citat:
Hatoyama to Nanjing, Hu to Hiroshima?
TOKYO - With the world economy's center of gravity shifting from the West to the East, led by China's rising economic and corresponding political power, the year 2010 may witness a series of epoch-making events in Asia.
A grand rapprochement between Japan and China could be one such happening, and the idea has been recently floated through the media by some anonymous diplomatic sources in Tokyo and/or Beijing, attracting a lot of attention among experts worldwide.
....
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Japan/LA12Dh01.html
Japan trenutno diplomatski pokusava da iseli amerikance iz Okinave...
http://www.zeenews.com/news595376.html
A Ruski analiticari ocenjuju da bi Kinezi mogli da naprave najveci "sah-mat" amerikancima. Obarajuci marionetski rezim u Severnoj Koreji(i pritom dajuci Kim Jong-il-u i njegovoj vladi azil). Time bi Juzna Koreja bila ujedinjena sa severnom, nestala bi DMZ medju njima(i 25.000 US vojnika), a takodje bi nestala i "potreba" za US marincima u istocnoj aziji, posto je Severna Koreja izgovor za dalje stacioniranje US vojnika. Tako bi US bila izbacena vojno sa dalekog istoka i baze bi bile pomerene istocno do Guam-a...
Prica o resursima, srednjoj aziji, Rusima i Kinezima je isto tako zanimljiva, pogotovu u zadnje vreme sa izgradnjom Bukhara–Tashkent–Bishkek–Almaty gasovoda i Kazakhstan-China naftovoda.
Sve, u svemu, Kinezi rade sve jako proracunato i jako pametno, nista nije slucajno, a taktika zasada radi jako,jako dobro...
A Google samo preti i pokusava da izboksa bolju poziciju u pregovorima koji ce sigurno uslediti, niko ne bezi od para i od Kine, jednostavno su preveliki da bi ih neko zaobisao...
EDIT:
@darkonsm
Ako poznajes kinesku istoriju kako tvrdis, daj mi odgovor na sledeca pitanja:
Ko je pre 1840-te zamalo bankrotirao Zapad ? Kakav je Kineski standard bio u tom periodu?
Ko je radio sta je hteo u Kini posle 1840? Koliko je opao Kineski standard posle toga?
Koliko vremena im je trebalo da se iskopaju iz toga ?
[Ovu poruku je menjao Igor Gajic dana 13.01.2010. u 19:06 GMT+1]