Prochitao sam ceo review Viste, ali ovo mi je nekako najvishe zapalo za ochi:
Citat:
As I said before, Virtual Folders don't actually contain anything per se. They're not "real" folders. You can't save a document to the All Documents Virtual Folder, but you can save a document to the Documents folder. Once you've saved that file, however, it will appear in both locations (Figure). Yep, it's confusing.
Microsoft continues this naming nightmare with other Start Menu links. The Pictures link (Figure) actually opens a Virtual Folder called "All Pictures and Videos" (and not C:\Users\Paul\Pictures). The Music link (Figure) opens a Virtual Folder called "Albums" (and not C:\Users\Paul\Music).
Bez neke zhelje da zapochnem flejm - pobogu, zashto??? I u XP-u je isti sluchaj, My Pictures folder (a i My Music) je po defaultu bio "shared" za sve korisnike, zar nisu mogli to da razdvoje za svakog korisnika posebno? Zaista jeste zbunjujuce, iskreno se nadam da ce to ispraviti.
A da, i:
Citat:
In Windows Vista Beta 1, Microsoft has blown most of that away. Instead of a Documents and Settings folder in the root of the system drive, you'll see a Users folder. And inside of that folder, you'll see folders for individual users (Paul and Administrator, for example) and a UNIX-like folder called Public.
Nekad davno sam rekao da ce MS iskoristiti sve (ili bar dobar deo) pozitivnih funkcija koje krase Unix-like sisteme, i da ce razlika izmedju Win i Linux GUI-a biti izuzetno mala... Po ovim shotovima se zaista vidi da je malo shta zaista odradjeno, a mnooogo vishe preuzeto tudjih ideja... Da ne znam da je u pitanju Windows Vista, pomislio bih da je izashao neki novi KDE...
If it weren't for the users, sysadminning would be easy.